Though I could probably go on at length about the moral bankruptcy of a political party who writes a blank check for war but decides it’s time to be more fiscally conservative when a healthcare bill comes onto the table (or a bill for any kind of government spending that doesn’t kill people), I instead want to talk about some of my favorite Republican half-baked selling points.
Lowering taxes for businesses creates jobs.
Actually, no it doesn’t. Though I don’t advocate making one’s government larger than it needs to be, lowering taxes for businesses isn’t going to make that business start hiring more people. What will make a business hire more people is a demand for more work for them to do.
Regulation stifles job creation.
That’s cute. Yes, everywhere around America, there are business owners with a stack of résumés on their desks and a shit ton of positions to fill, but they’re just so busy reading up on OSHA regulations to make sure they aren’t doing anything wrong that they just can’t call some of those candidates in for an interview. Regulation isn’t a governmental attempt to be dicks. It tends to be reactive to abuses of freedom. The art of policymaking like that is making a policy that inhibits the abuse but doesn’t inhibit anything else.
Taxing the rich is punishing them for being successful
Actually, how rich would you be if there were no infrastructure for your business to use? How rich would you be if you had no customers because they couldn’t get to your place of business? How rich would you be if you needed an army to guard your business at night to protect it from mobs of people coming to steal your shit? And what would protect your private army from just betraying you anyway and taking your shit?
The truth is, without a government, you would have had a lot more trouble making any money at all. Since you are richer than others, you benefitted more from the government’s services, so you pay them more. If we were sending you to prison for being rich, then yes, we’d be punishing the rich. But we’re not; we’re just taxing you more. And that money goes to make the country good so that its citizens are well off enough to keep buying your products or services.
Despite the fact that everyone looks to the government when the economy’s in the crapper, the government doesn’t have that many tools to improve the economy. It’s in the hands of the people who ruined it. The US economy’s in the crapper because corporations earn more profits than they historically ever have before (even adjusted for inflation), yet the wages of people have remained stagnant for years when accounting for inflation. Corporations moved our manufacturing sector overseas and thought it was great when their costs plummeted but now that’s caught up with them. Unemployment is high, yet those employed are overworked and underpaid. And the richest people in the US are richer than ever. If we really want the economy to get better, we need the people running our businesses to understand that long-term financial health means sharing the wealth.
Before the latest iteration of Apple TV was announced, the rumor mill was buzzing with an iOS based Apple TV. There was probably a bit of disappointment when el Jobso announced the newest Apple TV without “iOS” being uttered. People’s dreams of an Apple TV app ecosystem were shattered.
But according to this article, Apple TV does indeed run iOS. I figured as much (seriously, I’m not just saying that to impress you; I’d tell you if it surprised me) since the Apple TV is running one of Apple’s own chips, and the effort to port desktop OS X to the Apple TV just to use a modified front end would have been kind of wasteful. So it makes sense for them to be using an iOS codebase (which in and of itself is an OS X descendant).
So, why no apps?
Simple. Apple TV is new, and Apple isn’t ready for it yet. You can’t just say “let’s have apps on Apple TV” and it’s done. You have to build an SDK for Apple TV. You have to decide what controls to give developers, and what APIs they should use. You need to make decisions about what kinds of interfaces you’ll push developers to make. The 10 foot interface concept hasn’t really been mastered by anyone yet, which is kind of similar to how touch interfaces hadn’t been mastered before iPhone came out, and desktop GUIs hadn’t been mastered until the Mac was developed. And come to think of it, MP3 player user interfaces hadn’t really been mastered before Apple developed one. I’m starting to see a pattern here.
The thing is, although Apple’s had Apple TV for years, the market’s finally starting to get an appetite for one of what Apple TV does. In the advent of Hulu, YouTube, and Netflix, people are feeling the death of broadcast, and people who aren’t total nerds are starting to want something better than what other companies have been giving them. And Apple will dominate for sure. But they need to get it together themselves first before they let developers loose on this.
And when Apple does release a proper SDK, it’s not going to be anything too fancy, and it’s probably going to lack features people really want, but it’ll do core stuff very nicely. And people will bitch about Apple withholding features, but Apple will release those features when it’s good and damn well ready.
But I think it will be cool if Apple TV gets some APIs to allow for gaming with some Apple-released Bluetooth controllers. I’d love to see some cute little games out there.
Maybe it’s a part of growing up, but I just no longer have the interest in arguing about certain things I used to love debating/arguing about at length (i.e. OS X’s superiority to other operating systems). It is with a little bit of this wisdom that I see a little bit of myself in ZJEmptv on YouTube, a.k.a. Zinnia Jones, the “Queen of Atheism” (note: ZJ is actually a guy, and no, he isn’t trans, though given his look, he’s happy with being referred to as “he” or “she” and I may mix genders of pronouns in this post as it feels right).
(UPDATE Feb 2013: ZJ actually did come out as trans since I wrote this. Keeping gender pronouns as they were for posterity)
ZJ covers a wide variety of topics, but her two biggest topics are queer-related topics, and topics related to atheism. In the earlier videos, you’ll find a spunky teenager with unkempt hair with a bad attitude telling you about his dick (seriously), but there’s been a gradual transition to longer, better kept hair, some makeup wearing, and sadly, her videos are now very monotone; in a quest for better eloquence, she’s now writing out her video transcripts and reading off of them. It feels lacking in emotion and unhuman, but they’re her videos, not mine, and I won’t judge.
In any case, despite being a high school dropout and never having gone to college, ZJ is a fantastic debater, carefully picking apart opponents’ arguments and meticulously destroying them. ZJ is also no slouch academically, usually being quite knowledgeable about any subject he tackles (now I feel sexist, referring to ZJ as a boy when talking about his intelligence, but referring to her as a girl when talking about how her videos are robotic sounding… my bad) and being generally very well-informed.
To me it feels like such a waste of greatness to see him on YouTube. Have you ever read YouTube comments? I usually think twice before posting one myself, because I don’t feel idiotic enough to belong in the ranks of the people who leave the worthless drivel they call comments. And here ZJ is trying to win people over to atheism (an evangelical atheist?).
ZJ, this post is for you, and I’m giving you this advice out of pure admiration. If you’ll forgive the irony, you’re preaching to the choir. The religious people you try to reason with are not going to be convinced to abandon religion after seeing reason, and if they do, they’ll get there on their own. People don’t become religious because their minds followed a soundly logical path. Most of them just had it presented to them as fact at a very young age, and went with it. Others are looking for something to follow. Whatever the case, people who are sticking with religion are not doing so because it’s the logical thing to do. They’re doing it because they’re putting blind faith in the belief system, and the belief system was cleverly constructed to “reward” you for your blind faith. With an ingenious system like that, no number of YouTube videos will win people over. They’ll have to see it and realize it for themselves, just as you did at one point.
It’s sure frustrating, though, isn’t it? It’s frustrating to be a second class citizen because people want to turn their belief system into a law that applies to you. It frustrates me that I went through school thinking the US has cleared up all its injustices, only to realize after I came out of the closet that this was far from the truth, and it’s still socially acceptable by many to hate me for my orientation. It’s frustrating to see Australia, where gay marriage was overturned by a landslide vote. It’s frustrating to see the African countries where citizens cheer on the execution of gay people. It’s frustrating to see that anyone who believes in a religion is already 99% atheist because they don’t believe in any of the other religions, but are convinced that theirs is the right one.
In addition to the frustration, there are the true dangers of religion, which you point out. Humans are very prone to following authority, and you start to find that religious people become okay with genocide under the right circumstances (remember what other group of people became okay with genocide?). Religious people become complacent about child abuse under the right circumstances. Religious people make the connection that the war the US is in is somehow its punishment for not treating gay people badly enough. It’s enough to make you want to curl up in a ball, repeating to yourself “this isn’t the world I want to live in.”
So what do we do to spread the good word of atheism? Well, if I was convinced that you could convince people out of religion by the logical reasoning you use in your videos (even if it was just a few people), I’d say keep doing that. But as I said, if someone’s smart enough to connect the dots, they’re going to do it with or without your help. But look at the trends. The US is getting more secular with each generation, and despite religious people’s fighting, religious faiths are dying down. Religion is fading away, albeit at a pretty slow pace, and people are going to start treating each other better because of it. We have to push for better educations for people, and to equip people mentally with the bullshit detectors that will eventually go off one day when they’re sitting in church. We have to come out of the closet (I know, we did that once already, isn’t that enough?) as atheists. As more and more people start identifying publicly as nonreligious, people will start to realize that nonreligious people aren’t the savages religion makes them out to be.
So, ZJ, in conclusion, I love your spirit and your intelligence. Use those in a way to make a difference; to enjoy your own life and enjoy the mental freedom you get as an atheist who rejects gender boundaries. And I’d love to hear your take on my thoughts here, too. You always do have a way with breaking apart arguments. And if I don’t see a video or blog post about this, I’ll safely assume you couldn’t find flaws in my logic and I’ll assume I’m right.
EDIT: ZJ did respond quite promptly.
And here’s the video:
I think some very fine points are made by him. Certainly there is something to be gained through a healthy debate or discussion. My jadedness comes from seeing ZJ trying to reason with people who are either clearly idiots (like the kind you see holding up misspelled signs at Tea Party rallies) or they have some intelligence, and they try to come off as being really smart but end up throwing in a bunch of gaping logical fallacies.
For further irony, I often live by the serenity prayer in that sense, in that I’ve learned to have the serenity to accept the things I cannot change (i.e. people who are trollishly religious on YouTube), the courage to change the things I can (working to make the world a better place), and the wisdom to know the difference (rules like “if it’s a YouTube comment and it’s a large run on sentence with no punctuation marks involved at all, ignore”).
Thanks, ZJ, for your quick comment, and if there is a response, I look forward to watching/reading.